There are a large amount of websites on the market that use the word "future" in their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is recommended often by print publishers and editors that the term "future" is an excellent word to used in titles, because it grabs people's attention. But, when people use the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I believe they are.
Recently, an editor of a future of things type website asked me to publish a column, in reviewing the internet site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic side, and more heavy into the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is seriously interested in "The Future" then why are typical the articles about new scientific innovations in the present period or happening at this time? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It appears like they are seriously interested in scientific discovery that has already happened, not what will be in the future. That is just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I believe they can do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to create people think, worried you will get too much from your mainstream, quote "core" band of viewers, which I believe they cannot even understand.
Of course, as an entrepreneur, I know exactly why they get it done this way. It is because they would like to generate income and thus sink to a lesser degree of readership, while still pretending to speak about the ongoing future of stuff. When the editor wished to guard such comments, the indication was that your website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I observe that your website is mostly a news site and I ask what does which have regarding the ongoing future of stuff? Shouldn't the internet site be called NSIN.com or something like that; for New Science Innovation News? If your website is approximately Science News and is an accumulation everyone else's news, then it is really a copy site of a genre that's already used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore the same, so even when the articles are written more clearly and easier to know, that is nice, still what is the value to a "science news junky" as you can find very few articles on the internet site compared using their competition?
When they called them selves a news site, then you can have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the long run or they might keep the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a lesson to all or any "Futuristic" type websites as an instance study. For the long run thinkers to your website and have nothing to exhibit them, they'll leave. If you are using trickery to have regular readers there, you are doing an extreme disservice to the ongoing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions while the be all end all. In any event, it's unethical to use this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment